DP Gone Wild

A long time ago I talked about tier lists, what they meant, didn’t mean, and how they affected competition. This spawned some good discussion in a bunch of different directions and it was great to hear all your perspectives on this game and others. Greetings Dragon Ballers, Didier here with what I hope will be a large helping of brain food.

Point blank, I love putting numbers to things. Data sets seem to light the fires of my passionate loins. All of the comments from the aforementioned article got my wheels turning. What did the power level breakdown actually look like? Did the Double Power Rule really skew the environment? I set out to find these answers. But why stop there? If you know anything about me, I often take things much too far. It’s a blessing I’m married.

 GokuChiChiWedding.Ep.153

What I did

 

So I hear you guys like graphs. Boy you’re in for a treat! I decided to run some statistics on level one main personality levels. In order to begin, a population must be defined. It’s where you group your data set, make any assumptions, and where it’s easiest to introduce a bias.

Population Definition: “Level one personalities with the ability to be a Main Personality set that either has high usability or brings a unique personality power”

I looked over every personality in the current DBZ game, marking those that fit this population definition and got a total of 102 personalities! To me this was comprehensive enough to get a good feel for how trends were; adding/removing a few won’t change the results that much.

I then built a spreadsheet of these personalities’ power levels from one to max and what bracket on the PAT they were in. I compared each personality against one another with various first turn rules and ran numbers for each scenario with over 10,000 data points each. Needless to say, I have no life.

Beatdown or Control?

One thing that I think is very important is how these first turn rules affect the meta game overall. Having the first turn based on power translates into strong versus weak. You may tend to think stronger personalities are used in beatdown, but several weak personalities like Goku, the Puppet are wonderful for beatdown while some strong personalities like Majin Buu Defensive HT are great for control. Contradictions aside, if we want to find a definitive answer to this we can use our data. So what would be the main factor in a personality’s preferred deck type? The main thing that changes: Their powers.

Definition of a Beatdown Personality: Has a power that is an attack, draws cards, or gains anger/levels

199

Definition of a Control Personality: Has a power that is defensive or manipulates either player’s hand, field, or life deck.

P14

I ran through my population again and categorized each personality into beatdown and/or control. I did have some overlap and made personalities considered both control and beatdown (like Android 18). Doing this allowed me to take a population power level average:

Beatdown Average Power Level: ~845,000

Control Average Power Level: ~425,000

That’s convenient…looks like control is about half that of beatdown. Double Power Rule hmmm?? This is good enough for me to state that control personalities are in general weaker in power level than beatdown personalities.

 

The Removal of the DPR

 

It is no secret that the Double Power Rule being removed changed a lot about this game. Strong characters became so much more desirable because of not being a guaranteed second turn, while weaker characters like Master Roshi took a hit as they no longer had the first turn to prepare. So given that control characters are generally low in power level and beatdown characters are generally high, we can say that the removal of the DPR was a nerf to control and a buff to beatdown. There was a reason it was removed right? You bet there was.

Attachments_2014331 1

The above graph is a histogram; a way to represent how data is distributed across a population. As you can see three groups inside the population emerge. Weak personalities making up 25% of the total population (TP)  but going first against 75-95%, Medium personalities making up 13% and going first against 50-60%, and Strong Personalities making up 55% and going first against 0-20%.

 

See the problem? You have a select number of personalities that will be close to a guaranteed first turn against most of the total population while the majority is too strong to make use of the DPR. So even though many characters have personality powers that are unique, fun, and fuel useful decks, they become obsolete when considering personalities with a guaranteed first turn.

 

This separation of personalities comes from how power levels changed drastically over time in the series. Also, my population is defined as what could possibly be used in the current environment which didn’t exist until now. In staring at my data, I saw these groups emerge in terms of power level:

 

1- 30,000

200,000 – 800,000

1,400,000 – 1,800,000

Majin Buu

 

Interesting how the current PAT chart compares to this level one breakdown.

 

 

It’s Time to Go Wild!

 

So it has been decided that personalities in the D bracket will go second always. Right now, this is limited to Majin Buu and Janemba, translating to them going second against 97% of the population. Only the Kai’s and those two risk going second. But what alternatives do we have? A triple power rule?!?  No. I’ve looked at the data for all the rules I could think of. Rules based on PL chart brackets, ten above to one above zero. It didn’t look pretty. Did Buu get what he deserved? I don’t know honestly, he is no longer a “sit on Evil Buu L1” personality that’s for sure.

 

A part of me feels the random first turn is a hard buff to beatdown. If stronger personalities gain the advantage of more damage (and taking less damage), it was okay because weak ones went first. I’m not saying this was fair, but there was a check and balance. Right now weak guys get nothing. Blizzard had an interesting solution in giving ‘The Coin’ to the second player. Does DBZ need a second turn advantage? Start with a card in your hand? Going back to our roots and redefining the PAT, then building a rule off that is another option. Doing this with a (semi-) stagnant game makes sense. But that’s crazy! Damn right it is. It’s so crazy, it just might work

Gamer, scientist, and can’t shake this feeling; find me on Instagram and YouTube

Latest Comments

  1. Shannon April 2, 2014
  2. Chipmunk April 2, 2014
    • Didier Greenleaf April 2, 2014
    • Kolzi April 6, 2014
      • Didier Greenleaf April 6, 2014
  3. Josh April 2, 2014
    • Bryan Hayden April 3, 2014
    • Didier Greenleaf April 3, 2014
  4. Matt Gette April 3, 2014

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.